<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Regal Disappointment	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.neonbubble.com/blog/a-regal-disappointment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.neonbubble.com/blog/a-regal-disappointment/</link>
	<description>Cruise Blogs, Travelogues, Photos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2020 15:42:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://www.neonbubble.com/blog/a-regal-disappointment/#comment-53112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.neonbubble.com/?p=33248#comment-53112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.neonbubble.com/blog/a-regal-disappointment/#comment-53109&quot;&gt;Sandra &#038; Chris&lt;/a&gt;.

It is incredibly frustrating. I know there are people out there who don&#039;t care so long as they&#039;re on Ship X. And I know there are people out there who don&#039;t care so long as they&#039;re on any ship. For us, the ship isn&#039;t important but it and its features will factor into our reckoning and the reason we like to book early is because we&#039;re fussy about the sort of cabin we want and the preferred location; not always, but typically. And that was the case for this cruise. It&#039;s one thing for Princess to change one ship for another but if they&#039;re changing one class of ship for another then there really ought to be more flexibility to say &quot;Well, actually, you&#039;re not fulfilling the terms of the contract I agreed with you here so how about a full, no-fee cancellation?&quot; They have an extraordinary circumstances clause in their contract but it&#039;s vague enough that a ship change won&#039;t warrant it in this case. It&#039;s really irritating because we&#039;ve spent a lot of time telling people what a good holiday a cruise can be but then something like this happens and you think, ah, right, you&#039;ve got far more protection to cancel if you book another type of vacation and they can&#039;t match what you booked like-for-like, so maybe avoid booking cruises if this is a worry after all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.neonbubble.com/blog/a-regal-disappointment/#comment-53109">Sandra &amp; Chris</a>.</p>
<p>It is incredibly frustrating. I know there are people out there who don&#8217;t care so long as they&#8217;re on Ship X. And I know there are people out there who don&#8217;t care so long as they&#8217;re on any ship. For us, the ship isn&#8217;t important but it and its features will factor into our reckoning and the reason we like to book early is because we&#8217;re fussy about the sort of cabin we want and the preferred location; not always, but typically. And that was the case for this cruise. It&#8217;s one thing for Princess to change one ship for another but if they&#8217;re changing one class of ship for another then there really ought to be more flexibility to say &#8220;Well, actually, you&#8217;re not fulfilling the terms of the contract I agreed with you here so how about a full, no-fee cancellation?&#8221; They have an extraordinary circumstances clause in their contract but it&#8217;s vague enough that a ship change won&#8217;t warrant it in this case. It&#8217;s really irritating because we&#8217;ve spent a lot of time telling people what a good holiday a cruise can be but then something like this happens and you think, ah, right, you&#8217;ve got far more protection to cancel if you book another type of vacation and they can&#8217;t match what you booked like-for-like, so maybe avoid booking cruises if this is a worry after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sandra &#38; Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.neonbubble.com/blog/a-regal-disappointment/#comment-53109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra &#38; Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.neonbubble.com/?p=33248#comment-53109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I do sympathise Mark. We are gradually learning not to book in advance on a Princess cruise because the prices are initially a lot higher and, as a UK guest, you are locked into that price. And even if we wanted to move to another cabin in a different class it has to be at the price of that class when we booked it. Thus we were quite happy to be able to move back from the midship balcony assigned on the Regal change to the aft-facing balcony that we picked on the Grand at no extra cost. Why that didn&#039;t happen automatically in the re-allocation god knows!  That was until we checked the current cost on the Regal for the cabin next door - massively cheaper! So we cancelled and re-booked at the lower price having only lost the £1 deposit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do sympathise Mark. We are gradually learning not to book in advance on a Princess cruise because the prices are initially a lot higher and, as a UK guest, you are locked into that price. And even if we wanted to move to another cabin in a different class it has to be at the price of that class when we booked it. Thus we were quite happy to be able to move back from the midship balcony assigned on the Regal change to the aft-facing balcony that we picked on the Grand at no extra cost. Why that didn&#8217;t happen automatically in the re-allocation god knows!  That was until we checked the current cost on the Regal for the cabin next door &#8211; massively cheaper! So we cancelled and re-booked at the lower price having only lost the £1 deposit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
