Not A Man's Backside
29 Jul 2008 13:41 by Mark
This is not a man's backside.
I know this because I took the photo and among my many photographic Rules Of Thumb (similar to Ferengi Rules Of Acquisition) is this little gem:
Rule Of Thumb #24: No men's backsides! No! Curious is not a defence!
It's actually part of this picture.
Naturally, though, I'm worried.
You see ... I saw a man's backside.
I hope I'm not turning fruity.
Add A Comment
PLEASE NOTE! New and infrequent commenters may be comment-moderated, depending on whether you attempt to post links or use a link URL that looks "unusual". Regular commenters (under 90 days counts as regular) whose browsers accept cookies will be auto-approved to comment instantly. That'll teach you not to visit. HTML is not permitted. BBCode is allowed. Please see the Help Page for valid BBCode.
Why are you photographing your co workers?
Because they're there.
and this still does not look like a man's arse, unless yours looks like this?
I will take your word for it that this looks nothing like a man's arse based on the assumption that you've probably seen more of them than me.
Did you see a mans backside only when you zoomed in on the wrist area (perfectly acceptable), or did you somehow think of a mans backside just from the original picture (worrisome)? This is an important clarification that you need to make.