Fake Moon Landing Photos

The world is still divided between those who believe the lunar landings were genuine as they were backed by scientific fundamentals coupled with a hell of a lot of physical evidence to support them and those who wouldn’t believe their hair was on fire if you stood them in front of a mirror and handed them a concise pamphlet that explained what that hot feeling and that dreadful smell were.

So, did Neil Armstrong and Buzz "The Buzzmeister" Aldrin really walk on the moon while Michael Collins did the ironing in the lunar orbiter? Was the landing a hoax, a propaganda tool to use in the war of "who’s got the bigger penis?" going on with the Russians? The people who state that the landings were fake claim that you can’t trust the photographic evidence provided by NASA as photographic evidence is not a very trustworthy medium indeed. To prove their own case they use the photographic evidence provided by NASA as photographic evidence is a very trustworthy medium indeed, and their reasoning is often compelling if you’re tired and have had a few to drink.

Photos documenting the alleged fake moon landings can easily be found on the web. With the 40th anniversary of the Apollo XI moon landings almost upon us I’ve decided to group together some of the pictorial evidence against the moon landings being genuine and let you decide for yourself. Hoax? Real? Will we really ever know for sure?

Apollo XI Crew

One of the conspiracy theories linked to NASA’s Apollo missions to the moon is that actors were used rather than wasting money on fake-training former air force pilots. Certainly, it’s difficult to think of another reason why Jonathan Harris – better know for his role as Dr Zachary Smith in Lost In Space – made it into early publicity shots of the Apollo XI command crew.

Moon Shadow

The shadows cast on the moon seem to be a constant source of contention. Some people point out that in certain photos the shadows don’t appear to be parallel as if there were more than one light source or, bizarrely, the ground were in some way uneven. Other people notice oddities in the shadows as if there is something off camera that doesn’t seem to fit on the lunar surface.

Neil Armstrong

Do you know the Klingon proverb "revenge is a dish best served cold"? It is very cold… in space. And the moon’s in space so it should be very cold there too. Yet, the picture above clearly shows Neil Armstrong enjoying an ice cream, an unlikely choice of food for such a cold environment. But… a heavy suit under studio lights? Now that’s a different matter.

Author: Mark

Share This Post On

39 Comments

  1. haha! Great post.

    You know I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately, probably due to MJ’s death. Like Elvis, there will always be cynics that think he’s still alive despite anything you tell them.

    There’s a side of me that doesn’t blame them in a way. Media isn’t really concerned with "Truth" if you think about it … It’s driven by fear, doubt and controversy -whatever sells. I’ve grown to be critical of everything I’m told, and suspect this is healthy.

    But in this case, the failure to bring back any green cheese -and the glaring omission of any references to it- suggests to me that Buzz and Niel "Punk’d" us good …

    Post a Reply
  2. This is my favorite post so far. The first paragraph is worth the trip by itself and it just got better.

    Sarcasm. When does it become an Olympic sport?

    Post a Reply
  3. Hey! These fake moon landing photos are fake!

    Post a Reply
  4. Finally, proof of the conspiracy!

    Post a Reply
  5. I have a question. If the landing was done and the rockets were firing as the space pod landed would’nt the dust under and near the space landing site have blown away. I see foot prints in the dust all around the space shuttle. Can you reply to this as I am curious

    Post a Reply
  6. The answer to your question is … air. As in: ‘there isn’t any air on the moon.’

    The rocket flame (invisible as it burnt outside visible range) would have kicked up dust as it came into contact with it. Thereafter, said dust would have landed again, rather than being blown all over the place, because of there being no air. There was only a fine layer of dust on top of the moon’s rocky ground anyway. By the time the astronauts stepped out of the module all the dust nearby would have resettled on the surface more-or-less right where it had been previously.

    Post a Reply
  7. the moon landings WERE fake, Van Allen proves it. end of story

    Post a Reply
  8. Transition through Van Allen took approximately 30 minutes. In a shielded vessel. Low energy radiation fields beyond Van Allen were passed through in a further 90 minutes. In a shielded vessel. Trajectory chosen by all lunar vessels optimised to minimise time inside the belt. Total radiation exposure for the trip per astronaut worked out to around the equivalent of working with nuclear fuels for a year, or about the same amount of radiation a normal person would receive on Earth in around three years. Van Allen himself refuted any claims that the radiation would be too much to survive. End. Of. Story.

    Post a Reply
  9. they werent fake i know those astronauts and there my mums Best Friend and i know for a fact that it wasnt fake!!!!!!!! Check for yourself on http://www.nasa.gov

    Post a Reply
  10. these images are fake soz i didnt see the icecream

    Post a Reply
  11. WHAT’S WITH ALL THE NAMES IN CAPITAL LETTERS? DID NASA FAKE THE CAPS LOCK BUTTON TOO?

    Post a Reply
  12. In space… no one can hear you scream… I scream… we all scream… for ice cream!

    Post a Reply
  13. haha i knew it was fake!

    Post a Reply
  14. The moon landings were clearly fake. Everyone knows the moon is made of cheese*, yet the hard rock samples they ‘brought back’ weren’t the soft, silvery Wensleydale-like substance scientists expected. NASA slipped up there, but only a few of us know the truth.

    *Contrary to popular belief, the moon is not made of green cheese, although a rather tasty blue vein runs through the dark side.

    Oh, and hi Mark, sorry I’ve not visited for sooooo long, I fully expect to be moderated for my reclusion 🙂

    Post a Reply
    • I didn’t know some people on Earth were so stupid. Even the pink extra-terrestrials that look like leprecons and that doesn’t exist know more about the moon than you, dear Grazor.

      Post a Reply
  15. How did the lunar module take off from the moon and find the exact orbit to re unite with the mothership? There was no computer navigation, the astronauts had no vision (no windows) . They only had manual joysticks. That would have been an impossibility in 1969.
    Let’s see the disinfo crew answer that one???????

    Pete

    Post a Reply
  16. I used to dock my spaceship with the rotating space station on Elite on the Spectrum in the early 1980s using a manual joystick. And I’d had no training as a pilot. And I was about 12.

    P.S. Pete, your hair’s on fire.

    Post a Reply
  17. Excellent point Les, I used to do the same with a Commodore64 and a joystick that wouldn’t roll right properly due to a faulty switch. However I was about 14 at the time and had some experience as a palm pilot.

    Post a Reply
  18. No someone finally has some proof..Can you solve some of the other conspiracies that have plagued mankind..Great Post LMAO..

    Post a Reply
  19. Hey Mark goodwork man …….. u knw in america their are 84 % people who believes these fake landing or what ever ….. and 6 % dont agree with this and 10 % people didnt decided yet that this is real or fake ….. air is the best prove of the fake moon landing and their’s the flag was waving!!!

    Post a Reply
  20. It happened. I guess some people find it hard to believe in anything.

    Post a Reply
  21. Shane,

    I’ve run your comment through a Universal Translator left on Earth by Martians that crashed at Roswell and even it can’t work out whether you’re a believer in the fact of the moon landings or a believer in nutjob conspiracy theories. Under the assumption that the latter is true – borne out to some degree by the quality of the comment – then let’s talk about air and waving flags. The flag waved because it had lightweight metal poles in it for rigidity. Take something long and thin (no, not what you’re thinking of); a pencil for instance. Hold it at one end. Flick the other end. Notice it moving back and forwards. Notice that this was the result of you flicking it and not the result of a sudden hurricane passing through in front of the computer. Same with the flag. It moved because it had just been put in position and wasn’t very secure in the ground on account of said ground being hard rock with a shallow layer of dust on it as opposed to soil. Consider the alternative. Consider that NASA had built a closed studio and shot some fake footage. Consider that when it came time to put the flag in place someone said, ‘Hey, I’ve got an idea! Let’s turn on some fans. But we’ll have to angle them upwards so that only the flag moves but none of all that dust we painstakingly emptied from the hoover bags to spread all over the floor earlier does.’ Nut. Job.

    Post a Reply
  22. Hey…. Mark … buddy i am not a believer of moon landing …. i know its fake and their are a lot more proves that the landing of apollo 15 was fake …

    Post a Reply
  23. Is that Arnold Schwarzenegger’s shadow right there?

    Post a Reply
  24. its fake.i like that trumpet gee ur skuxx deluxx

    Post a Reply
  25. Yep as fake as Joan Collins suntan

    Post a Reply
  26. Of course it was all faked.

    Everyone knows that the astronauts were taken to the Moon aboard the Roswell flying saucer.

    Post a Reply
  27. Everyone, including my grandad whose been dead for nearly 40 years, knows NASA faked the Apollo Moon missions.

    Check out the nasascam website, it reveals everything about the scam.
    http://www.nasascam.bravehost.com

    Post a Reply
  28. Excellent website link Scooby Doo

    Post a Reply
  29. It’s always nice to see two people who think the moon landings are fake and who are so, so similar; I mean, let’s look at the evidence…

    Scooby Doo and The Clangers are both children’s programmes…

    Scooby Doo’s IP address resolves to the hex.as13285.net domain…

    The Clangers IP address resolves to the hex.as13285.net domain…

    It’s clearly fate that has brought the two of you completely different people to this site with your firm belief that the moon landings were faked and you certainly couldn’t possibly be the same person faking a corroborating comment to support your view because, well, I’m sure that you can see how that might be seen as a tad hypocritical or ironic at the very least.

    Post a Reply
  30. This is the biggest fraud in the history of mankind.
    Engineered by NASA .But always truth will surface.
    It is impossible for a man to walk on moon -at least for next 300 years.
    This is the latest– what science says.
    So who fooled whom?

    Post a Reply
  31. Ah, Sajan, I see from your IP address that you’re from the heart of Moron Country so that probably explains why you don’t provide any evidence to support your assertion that science says it’s impossible for a man to walk on the moon until 2310 at the earliest. We must suppose that something amazing will happen to either the moon (it will grow a moon ladder that extends to the Earth) or people (we’ll evolve space wings and fly) but I don’t imagine you’ll provide the answer any time soon because answers and supporting evidence are, I strongly suspect, alien to you.

    Post a Reply
  32. how are you meant to eat an ice cream with a space suit on anyways?

    Post a Reply
  33. I think it’s fake. I’ve been looking at some pictures on the nasascam site, and they all have the same background. It’s a con.

    Post a Reply
  34. The only thing fake here are the photos.
    Nice try.
    Actually, bad try.

    George Vreeland Hill

    Post a Reply
    • George. What? Are you a fake person?

      Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *